The Many Faces of Sexual Desire: When Psychoanalysis Listens Without Judgment
What if desire followed no rules? ©Shutterstock

Sexuality is not a single, fixed reality. Contemporary psychoanalysis moves beyond rigid norms, treating the many expressions of desire as personal narratives to be heard – not minimized, labeled, or corrected – across sexual orientations (homosexual, bisexual, asexual) and gender identities (transgender).

Psychoanalysis does not seek to confine desire within categories. It does not judge, direct, or impose a model. It listens. Since Freud, it has recognized that human desire follows neither a straight nor a strictly logical path. What we love, what we move toward, what attracts or unsettles us – all are shaped by the subject’s unconscious history: early identifications, missteps, wounds, and fantasies. Desire is a matter of singularity, not conformity. It has no single form. It can take on a thousand faces, a thousand paths, sometimes even contradictory ones.

Even for Freud, homosexuality was never regarded as a pathology, failure, or perversion. For him, sexuality was the product of a psychological construction – a complex inner journey. He saw each sexual orientation as the result of a unique compromise between desire, identifications, repression, loss, and defense. Moreover, he acknowledged that this orientation could evolve, always in accordance with the subject’s unconscious history.

The concept of psychological bisexuality, mentioned in the previous article, sheds powerful light on this plurality of desire. Every person, regardless of their anatomy, carries within them both masculine and feminine aspects. This internal makeup, shaped by identifications, allows for a wide range of positions in terms of desire. A man can desire another man without that defining his entire being. A woman can love women or change her objects of desire multiple times throughout a lifetime. Desire is not a fixed destiny; it is rather an adventure. And this adventure does not follow orderly paths.

Contemporary psychoanalysts recognize this complexity without attempting to confine it within labels. Homosexuality, bisexuality, asexuality, heterosexuality, pansexuality – each offers a way to describe the orientation of desire, yet none fully captures it. What psychoanalysis seeks to understand is not the label, but the story behind it. It does not ask “Who are you?” but rather “How did this take shape for you?” Sexual identity is not a fixed definition; it is a journey.

Asexuality, in particular, has long defied clear explanation. How can we understand an orientation that does not depend on sexual attraction? If libido is the very engine of psychological life, should the absence of sexuality be dismissed as mere inhibition, repression, or a symptom? Today, asexuality is understood as a distinct way of relating to the world, a singular modality. Not experiencing sexual desire does not mean experiencing no desire at all. There can be impulses, bonds, and deep attachments without necessarily acting on them. Asexuality is also a distinctive way of being in the world.

Transidentity has also challenged traditional categories. While psychoanalysis affirms the idea of a fundamental sex difference, it does not adopt a rigid stance. By rethinking sexuation as a symbolic process rather than a purely biological one, Lacan opened the door to a new understanding. Gender is no longer simply a reflection of the body but a linguistic, imaginary, and fantasmatic construction. What the subject says about their identity matters more than what their anatomy reveals. It is not biology that speaks, but discourse. The choice of object does not always align with societal expectations. Psychoanalysis does not reinforce social norms; it serves the subject.

New gender identities – non-binary, gender fluid, agender – offer psychoanalysis a valuable opportunity to listen to new ways of positioning oneself within desire, language, and relationships. The aim is not to validate or approve, but always to understand. To understand what it means for each individual to define themselves, to live, and to desire in this way. It’s about grasping the unconscious stirrings within the subject, the figures that inhabit them, and the words they use to express themselves.

In this context, fantasy plays a central role. In the psychoanalytic sense, it is not simply a daydream or a sexual image, but an unconscious scenario that gives structure to desire. It enables the subject to locate themselves, to tell their story, and to give form to what would otherwise remain undefined. Behind every orientation, every identity, every refusal or affirmation, there is a fantasized history. This is what analysis seeks to unfold – not to diminish, but rather to bring to light what the subject has long sought to express.

To reject this complexity is to reduce the subject to a symptom or a norm. It means missing the uniqueness that unfolds through the subject’s speech. To accept, on the other hand, this multiplicity of desire’s forms is to trust the unconscious to find its own paths. What guides psychoanalysis is the subject’s own truth – even when it unsettles, even when it overflows.

Psychoanalysis does not define who the subject is or who they should be. Instead, it helps them make sense of what escapes them, in their slips of the tongue, dreams, and repetitions. At times, it even allows them to express what they have never been able to put into words. Some desires find no place in everyday language. They must be invented, whispered, inferred, and carried into the light. This is where the work of analysis truly takes shape.

Sexuality is one of the most intimate realms of the subject, yet also one of the most exposed, regulated, and scrutinized. There can be a gap between what a person truly desires and what society expects them to desire. Psychoanalysis does not seek to close that gap. Instead, it stays with it, exploring and giving it a voice – one that is neither militant nor corrective, but alive.

What psychoanalysis hears without judgment are the singular voices that, through pain or discovery, tell how desire is sought, transformed, defended, lost, or ultimately found.

Comments
  • No comment yet